Update 11/13/2008 2:20 PM
After a quick review of MM8, here are my reactions:
1. MM Player. Doesn’t export text in the text boxes (at least
consistently; might depend on whether any highlighting or images appear
intext boxes), or any inking. Regrettably, this makes it MM Player useless for me and my colleagues.
2. Linking to dbs don’t help me much directly.
3. So called improved searching—I can’t see any difference in actual performance. Anyone who installed an ifilter had WDS search of mmaps for a long time. The speed of internal search seems unusable as it has always been.
Temporarily very excited b/c of MM Player export. But ultimately disappointed that MM Player only works with mickey mouse maps, that one might as well print to pdf.
As for the Mindjet Web, Mindjet Connect, etc., initiatves, I've found the marketing quite confusing. I think a "liteweight version of the app" as cloud service versus "co-mapping/screen sharing" versus "shared hard drive" in the cloud are potentially separate services. I can't tell you which MM product performs which service at what price--even though I'd be considered a sophisticated user. That's not a good marketing position to be in.
Continuing weaknesses:
Positives
Updated Mar 2006:
Since Mindjet published a small ”blurb” and then a case study about how I use Mindmanager in teaching, I have received numerous e-mail inquiries. Given limited time to respond, I thought it would make more sense to put up a standard web page response.
Many were interested in seeing some sample maps. Here are some examples from civil procedure (map 1, map 2) and communications law (map 1). (Note, that some of the diagrams embedded in the maps were created using other diagramming software, such as SMART Ideas.)
These are the maps that I archive at the end of class for my students. What is important to understand is that much of this material is created ”on-the-fly,” in real time. As I explain in my essay about using information technology in teaching, I think that it is imperative to be able to capture the dynamic interaction in class on the board. If you do not, at bottom, you encourage a passive form of learning which is not much different from television.
For teachers, here are some suggestions. Create your lecture notes in MM, color all notes to self (including extra details, reference, questions you might ask the students, etc.) that you don't want your students to see with some unique color. Then, before class, copy the relevant branches you'll be teaching into a brand new map. Select all the colored branches and delete them. Now you have the skeleton of the materials you want to teach.
Once class begins, your students should see only the first level of the map. Remember that the power of visual outlining software is that it allows you to see the big picture as well as drill down into details. Open up branches only as you go. Then, use MM like you would use a blackboard, but instead of writing on the board, type branches--not only your own thoughts and comments, but also the comments and answers of your students.
If you have a tablet, you can also draw (the Version 6 interface is much improved to X5 and now one can draw directly into a text box). Then move branches, reorganize them, color them, code them, etc. in real time.
To do this live, while using the Socratic method, requires extreme facility with the user interface. I use a tablet, and the pen is faster than the mouse. Also, I've written numerous macros that create hotkeys to highlight branches or put boundaries or open up one level only, etc. (Before you ask, I will not share these macros because they require some maintenance and do not work always perfectly.) I've reiterated to Mindjet that they should allow customization in terms of hotkeys.
In my view, Mindmanager appears to be the best program out there among the visual outliners. But there is increasing competition, which you should be able to locate easily on the Internet.
The greatest weaknesses of Mindmanager currently are:
These
faults notwithstanding, it’s still the program I use and
recommend. Version 6 just came out, and adds various sophisticated
tools. For most academics, the embedding of file attachments (if it scales well)
[looks like it doesn’t scale well] the custom data fields will probably
be the most important additions (and of course, better Tablet PC inking
support).
Good luck. I’m sorry but I cannot give any detailed recommendations or advice, as a general matter. I hope this get you started.
Best,
Jerry Kang