Watching the Watchers: Enemy Combatants in the Internment’s Shadow, 68 J. L. & CONTEMP. PROBS. 255 (2005) (peer-reviewed).
In Denying Prejudice: Internment, Redress, and Denial (2004), I tried
to further a careful remembering of the internment as precedent and
parable by holding the judiciary to account. The accounting was for
what it did not only in the 1940s internment cases decided by the
Supreme Court, but also the less well-known 1980s coram nobis cases
decided in the Ninth Circuit. My objective was to unmask the sophistic
ways that the judiciary avoided accountability for the racist civil
rights disaster. Using techniques often praised as minimalist, the
judiciary in the 1940s avoided accountability on the part of the
President and the Congress. With a straight face, the Court held that
the internment camps were never authorized by the political branches;
rather, they were an ultra vires frolic committed by a civilian agency
called the War Relocation Authority.
I
also showed how, in the 1980s, again using minimalist tactics, the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals quietly whitewashed history in the very
act that granted relief to those who challenged internment. In granting
the writ of error coram nobis and thereby overturning Gordon
Hirabayashi's criminal convictions, the Ninth Circuit simultaneously
excused the wartime Supreme Court of any wrongdoing. The official
explanation inscribed into the federal reports was that the Court was
duped by a handful of unethical Executive Branch lawyers. Accepting
this convenient falsehood as the truth allowed another denial of
accountability, this time on the part of the judiciary itself.
This
Article asks whether the judiciary is repeating this strategy of denial
in the enemy combatant cases. In other words, is the judiciary
exploiting similar interpretive and procedural tactics in order to
satisfy the dogs of war while simultaneously creating plausible
deniability for those who unleashed them? In addition, are we
witnessing a rehabilitation of the internment cases? My net assessment
is mixed, with good reasons for both optimism and alarm.
Keywords: internment, enemy combatants, korematsu, hirabayashi, yasui, endo, minimalism, passive virtues, judicial accountability, coram nobis, terror, torture
[download published version @ SSRN]